This material gathered here in my blog "Talking in Pictures" has been taking a slow turn in the course of its construction in the direction of including more varied kinds of visual materials.
I started with a focus on photography primarily--because so many of my current ideas about visual culture, especially since the completion of my Ph.D. in Cinema Studies on "Passing, Lynching and Jim Crow: A Genealogy of Race, Gender and U.S. Visual Culture, 1895-1927" in 1999, comes from the increasing availability of photography by and of blacks online and elsewhere. Especially crucial was the exhibition and accompanying text "To Conserve a Legacy" in 2000, about which I will have more to say in a series of posts from that time.
But the other part of the picture of black visual culture is fine art--in particular the image of the black in western art and African American fine art--and race in film. Of course, I was always limited by the lack of general access to such materials. The internet and digital techniques in the publication and reproduction of images has completely changed that situation in these early years of the 21st century.
I am feeling more and more prepared now, particularly as I have begun to construct a course on Black Visual Culture at the CUNY Graduate Center and at the M.A. level at the City College of New York, designed primarily to provide a generic introduction to the idea of the image of the black throughout Western Culture, to begin to ponder a general perspective on the matter.
Earlier remarks concerning the importance of photographic images follow. It seems to me these words are equally applicable to fine art and cinematic images of race:
"In preparation for a book about images--mostly photographs but some art and illustrations--in which race is a discernible object sometimes explicitly as would be the case with the works of such famous black photographers as Roy de Carava, James VanDerZee and Gordon Parks, or as would be less transparently so such as in the case with images in which race may be apparently absent, such as in Walker Evans' photographs of the white sharecropper families in Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, it is my intention to combine the accepted canon of American photography with less widely known and acclaimed works of photography, and to reorient the canon in favor of images documenting the lives and histories of the American people rather than in deference to an obsolete and Euro-centric notion of aesthetic excellence.
I started with a focus on photography primarily--because so many of my current ideas about visual culture, especially since the completion of my Ph.D. in Cinema Studies on "Passing, Lynching and Jim Crow: A Genealogy of Race, Gender and U.S. Visual Culture, 1895-1927" in 1999, comes from the increasing availability of photography by and of blacks online and elsewhere. Especially crucial was the exhibition and accompanying text "To Conserve a Legacy" in 2000, about which I will have more to say in a series of posts from that time.
But the other part of the picture of black visual culture is fine art--in particular the image of the black in western art and African American fine art--and race in film. Of course, I was always limited by the lack of general access to such materials. The internet and digital techniques in the publication and reproduction of images has completely changed that situation in these early years of the 21st century.
I am feeling more and more prepared now, particularly as I have begun to construct a course on Black Visual Culture at the CUNY Graduate Center and at the M.A. level at the City College of New York, designed primarily to provide a generic introduction to the idea of the image of the black throughout Western Culture, to begin to ponder a general perspective on the matter.
Earlier remarks concerning the importance of photographic images follow. It seems to me these words are equally applicable to fine art and cinematic images of race:
"In preparation for a book about images--mostly photographs but some art and illustrations--in which race is a discernible object sometimes explicitly as would be the case with the works of such famous black photographers as Roy de Carava, James VanDerZee and Gordon Parks, or as would be less transparently so such as in the case with images in which race may be apparently absent, such as in Walker Evans' photographs of the white sharecropper families in Let Us Now Praise Famous Men, it is my intention to combine the accepted canon of American photography with less widely known and acclaimed works of photography, and to reorient the canon in favor of images documenting the lives and histories of the American people rather than in deference to an obsolete and Euro-centric notion of aesthetic excellence.
Why? Not because one is right and one is wrong but because one is a great deal less interesting than the other.
Beauty and utility in myriad and unpredictable combinations provide layers of meaning, or concentrations of meaning and narrative, which means images of this kind invariably resonate far beyond whatever real things or people are included in them. Generally, when race is a factor, the narratives are adult and therefore are inclined toward sadness and regret rather than sentimentality and celebration. Many people are uncomfortable with such feelings and dismiss them as negative, not uplifting. But such images at their worst have many things to tell us of a forensic nature and at their best are sublime, frozen shadows trembling with the knowledge of the past, caught between life and death.
No comments:
Post a Comment