Showing posts with label Tuskeegee Institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tuskeegee Institute. Show all posts

10.13.2008

To Conserve a Legacy and Black Education








































Concerning To Conserve a Legacy: American Art from Historically Black Colleges and Universities edited by Richard J. Powell and Jock Reynolds, Addison Gallery of American Art and The Studio Museum in Harlem, MIT 1999.

Beverly Guy-Sheftall and Jo Moore Stewart, Spelman: A Centennial Celebration. Spelman College 1981.

Adam Fairclough, A Class of Their Own: Black Teachers in The Segregated South. Belknap Harvard 2007.

The Black Washingtonians: The Anacostia Museum Illustrated Chronology. Wiley 2005.

George Sullivan, Black Artists in Photography, 1840-1940. Cobble Hill Books 1996.

To Conserve a Legacy is where and when the sense of this project of race and photography really begun to take shape for me. The book on Spelman’s photographs was something I remembered, and it gave me early on with some inkling of what archives of photographs at historically black colleges could provide. But it is only with this new technological piece (internet, blogging, scanning and so forth) that I could begin to imagine the possibilities for somebody like me who can’t begin to get physically to all these archives at black schools for envisioning, thinking, teaching and being inspired.

The story of Spelman might provide the corner stone of the chapter or chapters on black education. It is one of the two only black female colleges and it has such a great photographic archive so little seen by the outside world. The way the book is presented, I can’t tell who actually took these photographs. Was there the combination at Spelman as at Hampton and Tuskegee of photographs by teachers, alumni and hired photographers such as Frances Benjamin Johnston?

I always like to know who took the pictures because it helps a great deal with understanding and interpreting the point-of-view, which is usually being represented somewhere. I notice the early shots of graduates mirror again the aesthetic qualities visible in the Paris Exposition photos and in the Johnston photos. Of course, the early faculty of Spelman was white and I am reading Fairclough to gain a better sense of the lay of the land in terms of the different racial dispositions which lead to the various black colleges, normal schools, Baptist academies etcetera. I still haven’t a sense yet of exactly how many different kinds of black schools there were at any given time. But I think that it is something important to know in telling this story of black photography since the photographs obviously were composed in order to serve those interests. It is good to know that there is an archive which resulted in a regular publication because then one learns by observing the process of selection.

Rereading it I don’t think I had realized the extent to which the role of black women and the education of black women and Spelman has been minimized in the telling of the story of the struggle between DuBois and Washington. Of course, the story of black education is central to the unfolding drama of Jim Crow segregation and the struggle for Civil Rights. And it has always seemed to me that the story of black education and the history of black educational institutions function as an essential mystery within the larger mystery of how it is we are ever going to go about getting our people on the right track educationally.

But the piece of it that has made me so curious as somebody who was raised and educated in the North and in integrated private schools about what happened in the South and most particularly in its classrooms is this: if the Civil Rights Movement and the Black Power Movement (or cultural nationalism) was about achieving equality, wiping out the caste of slavery, and getting rid of discrimination, the greatest failure has been this eternal problem of mis-education or the lack of an adequate education which continues to plague our children, and to some degree all of us.

In my experience at Cornell’s Black Studies Program, one of the oldest in the country, I got the sense that this yearning for an education that can liberate us is as much of a problem at the Ivy League Colleges and the State Colleges as it has been in the historically black colleges, because the kids at the Ivy Leagues may be able to achieve in a superficial sense but at the price of knowing next to nothing about the struggles and accomplishments of their forebears, particularly their female forebears who were so crucial to their own survival and success.

Anyhow, it goes around and around in circles but what I am trying to say is that education continues to be a hard nut to crack for us black folks. In the discussions of the fight against segregation, the focus is on the physical conditions but what about consciousness and philosophy? And I don’t mean just vocational versus academic. When we are dealing with rural students from very poor communities in a section of the country in which a high school education is still a luxury for a majority of young Americans, why is the most important thing whether or not there is someone qualified to teach Greek?

I knew black women leaders and intellectuals were trivialized but that the story we tell ourselves about the history of black education marginalizes the role of black women even as we are told again and again that the women were the only ones who were able to advance, is ironic. I wonder where Zora Neale Hurston was when all of this was going on. Why didn’t she have the opportunity to be in those earlier classes at Spelman when she might have attended without having to feel as though she needed to lie about her age.

Also that the story of black women’s education would be marginalized by discussions of women’s education is also something I had thought about because wandering through the libraries at Cornell I got interested in this vocational, industrial focus in early women’s education in the form of Home Economics. There was as well a history of a vocational emphasis at Cornell, which had been co-educational from the outset and geared toward farming and rural occupations apparently from the outset.

(My Aunt Barbara was the apple of everybody’s eye when she graduated from Hunter College at 16 in I guess 1943 and went to college at New York University majoring in Home Economics with a focus on Dietetics. It seems unimaginable to me that this was seen as an advance over becoming a maid. It was just the first chapter in a short and tragic life but that’s the other book).

When I saw the Conserving a Legacy exhibition at the Studio Museum the summer of 1999, what really stood out for me were the photographs—15 by Frances Benjamin Johnston’s from the Hampton Album, 13 of the Hampton Camera Club and other anonymous works sent back by Hampton graduates, 3 by Leonard C. Hyman from Tuskegee, 5 by Cornelius Marion Battey of Tuskegee, 7 by Arthur Bedou of Tuskegee, 2 by William Christenberry of Hampton, 1 portrait of George Washington Carver when he was a young man by Charles S. Livingston, 11 by Leigh Richmond Miner at Hampton, 3 by Prentice P. Polk of Tuskegee, 5 by C.D. Robinson of Tuskegee, 1 by Richard Riley, 1 by Herbert Pinney Tresslar, 1 by Doris Ullman and 8 portraits of famous people by Carl Van Vechten in the 30s. Which totals about 69 or 70 photographs.

Primarily what interested me in this group were the photos from Hampton and Tuskegee and the different generic conventions they represented. On one level, they seemed somehow highly familiar and yet I also knew even if I had ever seen such pictures before, I knew little about them and the people in them.

At the same time, my preoccupation with African American visual culture in recent years made me immediately aware that here might be some aspect of the archive documenting our steps as a people from slavery to our present marginal status in modernity. It was clear enough that these pictures presented in a fairly straightforward and humble way students and teachers at or around the turn-of-the-century engrossed in the endeavor of educating the former slaves and their children.

I also knew from the central role played by images produced at Hampton and Tuskegee at the turn-of-the-century, as well as images of Booker T. Washington and George Washington Carver, that the debate over manual training versus elite liberal arts training had been an issue and that these images portrayed institutions which were ostensibly devoted to so-called “vocational” training. Although I was also aware, given my interest in the Jim Crow violence which characterized this period in the South, that these schools functioned in the middle of an often terroristically violent environment. To look at these often tiny pristine images of African Americans whom I had wondered about so intensely for so long dressed so neatly in their period costumes, so serious in their preoccupation of getting an education and passing it on to the less fortunate children of the rural south was as healing as anything I had ever experienced during my years as a Northern African American. Of course, on some level I had always known there had to be such images since my great grandfathers and great grandmothers were such people, teachers in fact who started small schools in the South. But to actually see them finally on the wall of a museum I admire (not my ancestors particularly but some people like them) was to know immediately that I was going to spend a lot of time finding out exactly where they came from, how many there were and what they signified.

These images gave the lie finally to all the stereotypes that had ever worried me or any other African American. The debate was not even over whether or not they were positive or negative images or role models. It wasn’t a questions of whether the subjects were playing into some preconceived notions of African American abilities or not, as one would be led to believe in a novel such as Invisible Man. The point was that these people were every bit as real as Buck and Bubbles, as Williams and Walker, as Ma Rainey and Bessie Smith. And although the talented tenth must have been closer to a one thousandth at the time, nonetheless, they provide the balance of a picture of a people living under apartheid and making the very best of it under the circumstances.

There are the following articles in To Conserve a Legacy concerned with the photographs, short but providing crucial clues to my work:

1. Lux, Lies, and Compromise: The Politics of Light Exposure by Leslie Paisley.
2. Preserving the Cyanotype: Unlimited Access and Exhibition through Digital Image
3. Surrogates by MK Lalor, James Martin, Nicholas J. Zammuto
4. The Hampton Camera Club by Mary Lou Hultgren
5. Chronicling Tuskegee in Photographs: A Simple Version by Cynthia Beavers Wilson

10.09.2008

Added Notes--Music and Black Colleges

Concerning Jazz, Music and Performance:

1. Geoffrey C. Ward and Ken Burns, Jazz: A History of America’s Music. Knopf 2000.

2. Charles Graham, The Great Jazz Day. Woodford Publishing 1999.

The second book tells the story of the great jazz photograph featured in Esquire in 1959. There is also a documentary about it. The advantage of this particular book and packaging of Jazz photography is that it composes an anthology of jazz remembrances and jazz photography: Milt Hinton, Ralph Ellison, Art Kane, Sonny Rollins etcetera.

I am not an avid fan of the Ken Burns series but the book has extraordinary performance photographs, some of which I haven’t seen before. If memory serves, much of this material would be accessible at reasonable prices. If it isn’t, whatever is expensive, we can avoid because there really is so much wonderful performance photography which hasn’t been much seen except by those of us who are completely obsessed with the subject.

Of the things I particularly would want to include (aside from anything involving either Louis Armstrong or Billie Holiday both of whom have been seen more than anybody else although I think not by the average black audience for books), I like all those wonderful orchestras and bands my parents grew up listening to and dancing to. The ones who are all dressed to death in matching suits and so forth. This image is really so much in conflict with what our children are currently learning about black history and culture, unimaginable really.

I liked that whole style of being dressed up and doing things in unison, which I saw so much of at the Apollo still in the sixties, and don’t feel as though it is adequately documented in terms of discussions of photography. It would be good, as well, to emphasize the more unusual photos of black female performers, in particular instrumentalists.

Many of our singers have been given short shrift especially in the looks department on the idea that they weren’t good looking (which probably means too dark) but these women are often exquisite looking: different and stunning if nothing else. Neither Bessie Smith nor Ma Rainey ever took an uninteresting picture. Not to mention the beauty of Ella Fitzgerald, Dinah Washington and Sarah Vaughn—all of whom I saw perform many times and who provided much of the musical background of my life growing up. This is perhaps true for most black women my age.

Of course, I feel as though Josephine Baker, who has been so under appreciated and misunderstood by Afro-Americans, should have her own chapter in which we can finally reclaim her as part of the African American performance tradition (along with Florence Mills and Ethel Waters) which traveled all over the world trying to escape from racism at home.

I would love us to emphasize the rare but extraordinary female instrumentalists, in particular Mary Lou Williams (about which there are two recent books that are highly informative: Morning Glory: A Biography of Mary Lou Williams by Mary Dahl, University of California Press 2001 and Soul on Soul: The Life and Music of Mary Lou Williams by Tammy Kernodie, Northeastern University Press 2004). As it turns out, Mary Lou was a major midwive for the whole bebop scene, a nurturer as well as a genius as a performer and a composer so she is a real role model that young black women know little about. I knew her in her later years. 

There was this priest who was very connected to the jazz scene who was after me to write about her for The Village Voice so I got to see her, meet her, so forth but it was way over my head to comprehend her contribution, particularly given that there was so little written about her then. She performed frequently at the Cookery, as did Alberta Hunter whom I also met. She was a central figure too. The other woman I want to point out is somebody I’ve noticed in a lot of the pictures but know little about: Melba Liston.  Maybe she plays trombone.  

She is very very cool looking, obviously an important instrumentalist on a lot of recording sessions. 

Speaking of which there is a film of Big Momma Thornton singing Hound Dog at a Blues Festival in London which is just incredible. There's also some great footage of Sister Rosetta Tharpe performing in England.  There are entire films such as St. Louis Blues, Stormy Weather, Cabin in the Sky and New Orleans which have been hidden away and forgotten collectively by black and white coalitions of high brow opinion (on the grounds that they are somehow unflattering) in which there are contained wonderful performances and real clues as to what became of African American contributions to American popular culture. 

There is a book about film, which I am planning to pursue under "Movie Talk" as a separate blog, that I am planning to do eventually, maybe next year or the year after (if somebody else doesn’t write it first) and I think we should probably use only so much of this movie material as serves to offset the more sociological and less entertaining or pleasurable materials. In another words, to achieve the sense of a multi-disciplinary and representative mixture of the depths which lie in the archives.


9.21.2008

Legacy of Lynching--Bill Moyer's Journal

Bill Moyers does absolutely wonderful shows, accessible by website and by podcast, as well as on television-- although, probably like many of you, I follow very few things on actual television broadcasts anymore.  No time.

In any case, since we are on the subject of lynching photographs, Moyers has an excellent site posted November 23, 2007, which recaps some of the research and commentatory on lynching, as well as providing an excellent visual display of some lynching images with annotation at www.pbs.org/moyers/journal11232007/profile2.html.

This summation includes a series of photographs compiled by Ken Gonzales-Day, including lynchings of Native Americans, Chinese and Latinos, Emmett Till and his mother, as well as an overview including the keeping of lynching statistics at the Tuskeegee Institute from 1882-1968 and the anti-lynching crusade of Ida B. Wells-Barnett.

Apparently, in 2005, Congress formally apologized for failing to act on some 200 anti-lynching bills.  The resolution states that the Senate "expresses the deepest sympathies and solemn regrets of the Senate to the descendants of the victims of lynching, the ancestors of whom were deprived of life, human dignity and the Constitutional protections accorded all citizens of the United States."  


About Me

My photo
I am a writer and a professor of English at the City College of New York, and the CUNY Graduate Center. My books include Black Macho and the Myth of the Superwoman (1979), Invisibility Blues (1990), Black Popular Culture (1992), and Dark Designs and Visual Culture (2005). I write cultural criticism frequently and am currently working on a project on creativity and feminism among the women in my family, some of which is posted on the Soul Pictures blog.